For gaps that automation can't fix.
350,000+ verified participants · 38+ countries · 300+ filters




200,000+ AI model engagement studies run on Prolific.
A third of ICML 26 position papers agree: benchmarks, LLM judges & majority-vote labels fail at audit. The best models develop with the perfect blend of automation and human insight.

How do humans actually behave?
Get real task execution and interaction data from a verified, diverse population, to form the ground truth your model needs to navigate like a real person.

Is my model's output genuinely good, or just liked?
Preference is what someone chooses, taste is whether it's actually good. Learn where your model's output lands with real arbiters of taste, who are qualified and selected for their discernment.

When the wrong call has consequences
A threshold set by the wrong sample is a risk no one can afford. Draw the signal from qualified evaluators, credential-checked Experts and representative populations, so the call your model makes holds up.
"Red-teamers are doing incredible work: surfacing nuanced adversarial use cases that we wouldn't have otherwise caught."
Why AI teams choose Prolific to improve model engagement
Trusted by AI/ML developers, researchers and leading organizations across industries.
Get the right humans, exactly when you need them
Questions
T b c
TBC
TBC
TBC
TBC






