Evaluate complex financial reasoning with verified finance experts
Expertise you can examine
Start with verified professional experience. Then define the specific knowledge and evaluation criteria your financial AI needs.
Put financial expertise to work on your AI
Use cases to scope with our team, from specialist evaluation to expert feedback for training. Availability and delivery are confirmed for each study.

The judgement behind the answer
A useful finance evaluation explains why an answer is credible. Ask experts to identify the assumptions, source evidence and missing information that affect a conclusion.
For a workflow study, agree what to capture at each step, from the initial interpretation to calculations, revisions and the final assessment.
Study outputs to consider
- Calculations and supporting evidence
- Assumptions and alternative interpretations
- Expert ratings and written rationale

Structure feedback around your research question
Define a rubric that separates numerical correctness, financial reasoning and evidence quality. Specify the market, reporting period and reference material the reviewer should use.
Agree how ratings, annotations and explanations should be delivered so your team can examine errors and compare model versions.

Turn expert feedback into a better next iteration
Use specialist review to investigate weak financial reasoning, compare candidate responses and identify gaps in your evaluation set.
For training work, scope preference judgements, corrected responses or expert-labelled examples. Match the deliverable to the behaviour you want the model to learn.

Build quality into the study
Prolific combines human review, model-based checks and automated validation according to the task. You retain approval of submissions.
For your finance study, agree the qualification criteria, reference answers and review process up front. Make room for legitimate disagreement, especially where professional judgement depends on context.
Start with the financial decision your model needs to support
Human evaluation, grounded in research
Explore Prolific’s wider AI work and evaluation methods.
Let’s scope your finance study
Frequently asked questions
Prolific’s growing network includes credentialed finance professionals. Share the discipline, professional experience, geography and qualifications your task requires. The team will confirm the available profiles and feasibility for your study.
Prolific checks identity and quality, and verifies professional claims against independent sources, including official registries where they exist. The credentials and task-specific qualification criteria for your finance study are agreed during scoping.
Yes. Bring your tasks, reference material and grading criteria to the scoping conversation. Define the output format and acceptance criteria with the team, and agree how ambiguous answers or reviewer disagreement should be handled.
Include a representative task, the intended model users, finance discipline, jurisdiction, reference date, required expert profile and expected volume. A synthetic or public-data example can help the team assess the work before any sensitive material is shared.
Expert evaluation can help you identify errors and assess outputs against a specified framework. It does not provide regulatory certification or replace your organisation’s legal, compliance or model-risk approval processes.



